I recently discussed the problem of lazy/weak/overused words with a couple of my editing clients. One that has always threatened to make my head pop like a thirteen-year-old’s week-old zit is the useless “very.”
Not 48 hours after that last discussion, I came across this tidbit in the May 2011 issue of The Writer, in an article by Erika Dreifus entitled “2 Takes on the Power of a Single Word”:
…novelist Brock Clarke’s entry on “very”:
“Is there a weaker, sadder, more futile
word in the English language than very?
Is there another word as fully guaranteed
to prove the opposite of what its speaker
or writer intends to prove? Is there
another word that so clearly states, on
the speaker’s or writer’s behalf, ‘I’m not
even going to try to find the right word,’ or
‘No matter how hard I try, I’m not going to
find the right word’? Is there a less
specific, less helpful, less necessary, less
potent word in our vocabulary?” Already,
before completing a full page, Clarke has
convinced us: “There is not.”
Can I have an “Amen!”
‘Til next time, and as always, remember: To write well, you must work hard. To succeed in this tough gig, you mustn’t be lazy (or discouraged).
———-
http://www.reorichesformula.info/2011/05/affiliat… Thanks for that awesome posting. It saved MUCH time 🙂